My rationale was that the citizens developed an emotional attachment to the founder that could not be transferred. Anything else is just governance.
But in the interest of accommodative game play, why not. It's not a big deal to preserve an owner in addition to a founder.
You would have to do it while in the same empire as the city, so you have access to the Cities and Bases window.
Founder rights will really be owner rights because the founder is automatically the owner. Once ownership is transferred, the founder should have no authority.
But in the interest of accommodative game play, why not. It's not a big deal to preserve an owner in addition to a founder.
You would have to do it while in the same empire as the city, so you have access to the Cities and Bases window.
Founder rights will really be owner rights because the founder is automatically the owner. Once ownership is transferred, the founder should have no authority.